was just lately invited to be a witness at a Overseas Affairs Committee hearing, which was hunting into the risks arising from foreign investments in Uk tech firms, the viability of screening investments on nationwide safety grounds and the wider implications of tighter International Direct Investment decision (FDI) controls on this flourishing sector. The committee was searching for to have an understanding of to what extent the British isles is under threat from tries by hostile actors to asset-strip essential technologies and industries.
I was attending in my dual capacity as founder and CEO of crayfish.io (itself a technological know-how-driven startup) and as co-vice chair of the British isles-China Tech Discussion board. I was asked, as an opener, if I had any knowledge of concerns with mental house (IP), tech transfer and hostile takeovers arriving out of foreign investment decision inside the British isles. I never and hardly ever have.
Organizations do have issues with mental property in foreign nations around the world (which include China) – but that is not for the reason that of getting a international investor. Typically, in that market, it’s down to complications with distributors, shoppers or suppliers. But it’s definitely not brought on by foreign financial commitment, and I do not consider there must be a blanket prohibition.